WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN IN THIS AREA: Module evaluation plays a key role in institutional quality assurance, enhancement and reflective practice; Student feedback, often using standard questionnaires, plays an essential role in the process; An alternative evaluation approach is the use of ‘nominal group technique’ (NGT).
WHAT THIS WORK ADDS: This study directly compares standard questionnaire-based evaluation with NGT; NGT provided added value by allowing students not only to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a module, but also crucially to discuss ways to enhance learning, negotiate, and propose shared solutions to any conflicting views; Routine use of NGT may be unfeasible due to the time required for data collection and analysis; NGT may be particularly useful in the development of new modules, or to assess underlying reasons when poor feedback has been obtained using conventional evaluation questionnaires.
SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH: Evaluation of NGT methodology in different settings and with diverse student groups is needed.